This post is mostly a thought experiment The thought was something along the lines of: I have a table I want to keep temporal history of. I don't plan on keeping a lot of data in that table, but the history table can accumulate quite a bit of data. I want to partition the history…
You can do a lot with Extended Events
I'm really looking forward to the stuff in 2016 becoming mainstream in 2020 or so. Raise your hand if you're using SQL Server 2014 in production. Raise your hand if your vendor supports SQL Server 2014.
Okay then.
Everyone knows Implicit Conversion is bad
It can ruin SARGability, defeat index usage, and burn up your CPU like it needs some Valtrex. But what about explicit conversion? Is there any overhead? Turns out, SQL is just as happy with explicit conversion as it is with passing in the correct datatype in the first place.
Moving parts SQL Server keeps on growing. With every new edition, you get more features, feature enhancements, and uh, "feature enhancements". As I'm writing this, SQL Server 2005 is less than a week away from support ending, and SQL Server 2016 is up to RC2. Brent's retrospective post got me thinking a bit. We went…
With the release date for 2016 finally announced Everyone can start gearing up to gaze upon its far shores from the 2008R2 instance they can't or won't upgrade for various reasons. I'm excited for a lot of the improvements and enhancements coming along, and generally hope I'm wrong about customer adoption. One annoyance with the…
Sometimes SQL is the presentation layer
And when it is, you end up doing a lot of concatenating. This isn't about performance, or trying to talk you out of SQL as the presentation layer, this is just something you should keep in mind. SQL is a confusing language when you're just starting out. Heck, sometimes it's even confusing when you've been doing it for a long time.
Let's face it, most people don't have just one SQL Server
How many they tell Microsoft they have is another matter, but let the record show that I don't condone licensing dishonesty. But going one step further, most places... Well, they're 'lucky' if they have one DBA, never mind a team.
Everyone else: Give me your network people, your sysadmin, your huddled SAN group yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming developers.
Sometimes great things stare you in the face for years
Sometimes they stare at you for so long that you stop noticing them. This isn't a romdramadey tag line. There are just so many buttons to push. Sometimes pressing them is a horrible idea and it breaks everything. I lose my mind every time I go to move a tab and I end up undocking a window. This won't save you from that, but it will at least save your mouse scroll wheel.
I hate rebuilding indexes
There. I said it. It's not fun. I don't care all that much for reorgs, either. They're less intrusive, but man, that LOB compaction stuff can really be time consuming. What I do like is updating statistics. Doing that can be the kick in the bad plan pants that you need to get things running smoothly again.
If there's one thing living in Texas has taught me It's that people are very paranoid that you may Mess With it. Even in Austin, where the citizenry demand weirdness, they are vehemently opposed to any form of Messing, unless it results in mayonnaise-based dipping sauce. Me? I like Messing With stuff. Today we're going…
Auto Create Statistics is your friend
It's not perfect, but 99% of the time I'd rather have imperfect statistics than no statistics. This question struck me as interesting, because the optimizer will totally sniff parameters to compile an initial plan. If you don't have index statistics, or system statistics already on a column in a WHERE clause, SQL is generally kind enough to create a statistics object for you when the query is compiled.
These things used to confuse me so much
Despite having worked at a Market Research company for a while, I know nothing about statistics, other than that project managers have all sorts of disagreeably subjective phrases for describing them. Vast majority, convincing plurality, dwindling minority, et al. Less talky, more picture.
When I started getting into SQL Server, and learning about statistics, I heard the same phrases over and over again, but wasn't exactly sure what they meant.
I hate DBCC Commands
Not what they do, just that the syntax isn't consistent (do I need quotes around this string or not?), the results are a distraction to get into a usable table, and you need to write absurd loops to perform object-at-a-time data gathering. I'm not talking about running DBCC CHECKDB (necessarily), or turning on Trace Flags, or any cache-clearing commands -- you know, things that perform actions -- I mean things that spit tabular results at you.
Every single time
Really. Every single time. It started off kind of funny. Scalar functions in queries: no parallelism. Scalar functions in computed columns: no parallelism, even if you're not selecting the computed column. Every time I think of a place where someone could stick a scalar function into some SQL, it ends up killing parallelism. Now it's just sad.
This isn't about performance
If you're interested in performance tests, you can get in the way back machine and read a couple posts by Adam Machanic here and here. I'm also not talking about the difference between them. There are a million articles about that. They're obviously different, but how does SQL handle that internally?
This post isn't going to solve any problems for you It was just something I stumbled on that struck me as funny, while working on a demo for something else. Brent didn't believe it at first, so I thought I'd share with the class. Blog. You, Your Name Here. Hiya! So there I was, creating…
One year ago today!
Well, sort of one year ago. Who knows when this thing will get published? Only God and Brent. And part of the calendar year fell during a leap year, which was just plain cruel, like a two part Buffy episode where the second part is the first episode of the next season DAMN YOU JOSS WHEDON!
What a gem! Minimal logging is super cool. If you follow all the rules, there's a pretty good chance it will work! Unfortunately, it's not always up to you. All sorts of ISVs put out all sorts of bad ideas in form of code. Sort of like in Ghostbusters, when Gozer tells the crew to…
Sometimes you need garbage
Not because DBAs are the IT equivalent of Oscar the Grouch, but maybe you want to post a question on a forum, and you don't want to use your own data. At least, you probably shouldn't just post your own data without masking it. But masking data is annoying, and by the time you get everything in order, someone's breathing down your neck for an answer.
SQL Server 2016 is adding some really awesome stuff Not the least of which is a ton of super cool information in execution plans, and an Extended Events session to expose the same information for all queries. The details are detailed in detail over on this blog post from MS. For those of you with…
