Upgraded My Web Host

12 Comments

The good news: I’ve been getting a lot of web visitors lately.

The bad news: I’ve been getting a lot of web visitors lately.  The last dot is April (the down-slope is May, Google’s graph labels are goofy.)

Up Up and Away!
Visitors - Up Up and Away!

I don’t write my stuff in order to get hits.  I’ve always taken a simple approach to what I write: if I’ve got a problem, and I can’t find the solution quickly online, then I document my solution on my site.  Sometimes it’s about SQL Server, sometimes it’s about Twitter, and soon I’ll have a big post on how to build a Hackintosh.  The thing is, when you write something useful, other people do come visit, and it really starts to build up steam.

How I Started: A Shared Web Host

For years, I’ve relied on a shared web host plan from HostGator and been very happy with it.  For about $25/mo, you get 24gb of drive space and 250mb of bandwidth.  In April, I used around 3gb of disk space and 25gb of bandwidth to serve about 50k visitors.

However, as a SQL Server DBA, I can tell you that storage space and bandwidth have nothing to do with performance.

You can serve static HTML files all day long from a cheap shared web host, but when you introduce applications like WordPress, MySQL and 3rd party plugin applications, suddenly you’re talking about CPU and memory capacity issues.

The first workaround is to use caching: if your web site isn’t changing that fast (like if people aren’t leaving comments like crazy) then it makes sense to cache as much as possible.  Serve pages out of memory instead of rebuilding them every time, and you’ll cut down on the number of requests sent back to the database.  For WordPress bloggers, that’s as simple as using the plugin WP-Super-Cache: just install and enable it, and it automatically serves cached pages to your visitors.

Caching Isn’t That Easy

I lied: caching isn’t as easy as installing a plugin.  Oh, sure, that’s what the sysadmins will tell you, but it only works if all of your other plugins work correctly with WP-Super-Cache.  How can you tell?  Well, uh, you can’t.  The first problem I ran into was that the MobilePress plugin (which makes your site look better on iPhones and Blackberries) doesn’t always work correctly if WP-Super-Cache is enabled.  I decided to abandon mobile support in favor of caching, because I didn’t want my site to fall over when I got linked by someone famous.

Later, I played around with plugins to display ads on my blog if the visitor was coming from a search engine.  Statistics show that visitors from Google stumble in looking for a particular solution, and they’re more likely than other users to click ads.  Bloggers should avoid showing ads to their regular readers, because those folks aren’t tempted to click ads.  I dabbled with running ads on my old posts, and I ended up making around $100/month.  However, when I ran ads, the caching didn’t work correctly: they would cache the ad status based on the first visitor to the page.  If that visitor was eligible to get ads, then everybody who saw the cached page also saw ads.  I could disable caching, and then everybody got the right content, but then I was running a risk of putting too much load on my web site again.  That time, I decided to abandon ads in favor of caching.

This past Sunday I redesigned BrentOzar.com, and in the process, I temporarily disabled caching so that I could test my changes in several browsers & OS’s in rapid fire.  Sundays are usually low-traffic days, so I wasn’t too worried about load.  Erika and I drove over to my parents’ house to say goodbye before they embarked on a road trip, and when I came back home, my web site was down.

When Sysadmins Attack

Sherri Shepherd, co-host of The View, had Tweeted a link to my Twitter tips.  (Side note – after chatting with her for a while, I can see why she’s a host – she’s one of those people you just naturally want to open up to.)  She had about 68,000 followers at the time, and enough of them clicked on the link to make my web host notice.  HostGator’s sysadmins shut my site down for using too much CPU/memory, but they didn’t call me to tell me that.  Instead, they simply changed permissions on one of the PHP pages on my site so that WordPress wouldn’t work.  I had no idea my account had been shut down, so I started troubleshooting the site.

I found the permissions problem, contacted HostGator, and things went rapidly downhill from there.  I’m not going to go into details here because it’s not going to fix the problem, but I’ll give one particular lowlight: I was told by an engineer that I would need to call back later after the security team was done with their current stuff.  I wasn’t allowed to hold – I had to call back later when it might be a better time for them.  Riiight.

Douglas Hanna, the Customer Service Manager for HostGator, followed up with me the next day:

“I really can’t apologize enough for what seems like you serving as a example of Murphy’s Law at HostGator. Issues like this are difficult to deal with in the first place and I completely understand your frustration when we don’t deal with the issues properly on our end.”

Douglas and I had a long and constructive email thread about the problems I encountered, and he’s already started taking actions to make sure they don’t happen again.  At that point, though, I’d already moved my main site onto another hosting provider (MediaTemple) temporarily while I research the best dedicated hosting provider for my needs.

When You Should Upgrade Your Hosting Plan

In the process of researching hosting plans, I ran across a good summary of WordPress loads by David Seah:

  • 500 pageviews a day will be your first sign of strain if you’re using one of the el-cheapo $5/mo “unlimited” hosting plans.  You’ll need to look at caching or reducing your WordPress plugin use.
  • 1,500-2,000 pageviews a day will be your next wall with reseller web hosting plans.  You have to start paying attention to image sizes, plugins that load a lot of external files, comment spam, reliance on other web sites, and so on.
  • 3,000-5,000 pageviews a day starts to run into problems on shared server plans like my $25/mo plan at HostGator.  At this point you have to be really careful with your configuration, or consider moving to a private virtual server.

I’ve been doing around 3-4k pageviews on weekdays, but on peaks when I get links like Sherri’s, I hit 8-10k pageviews per day.  Even though I could probably hunker down, do some serious tweaking, and make it work on HostGator, it was time to kick it up a notch.  A dedicated virtual server would give me the power I need to run ads for Google visitors again, and that would pay for itself.

Even with moving to my own server, though, I still couldn’t ensure that the site wouldn’t fall over if Sherri tells Barbara Walters about it, so I’m taking another step too.

Caching Images on Amazon S3

Images take a lot of time to download relative to the text of a web page.  Even my fairly minimal web site had a lot of small images after my redesign.  To see how images impact page load time, get the free Firefox extension Firebug.  It shows a complete breakdown of all the factors involved with a page load.  The most obvious example is the large picture across the top of the site, which shows several of my portraits by TheFuzzball.  That image is roughly 70kb, and when hosted on my web server, it took over a second to download.

Instead of hosting that image on my web server, I copied it to Amazon S3, a cloud-based file storage service that can also act as a web server for static files.  I’ve talked about S3 here before, like when I started selling Twitter t-shirts with a site hosted on Amazon S3.  (Latest tally on that project: in the black by $50.)  The domain name i.brentozar.com points to an Amazon S3 storage bucket.  I changed the web template to pull the header image from S3, and now the download takes around 300ms instead of 1200ms.  Still not blazing fast, but better than 1 second, and furthermore, it takes more load off my web server in the event that I get a ton of sudden traffic.

This same technique can be used for images embedded in posts, too.  The TanTan Amazon S3 plugin for WordPress seamlessly swaps out the WordPress upload code behind the scenes so that when you upload pictures for your posts, they’re automatically stored in Amazon S3 instead.  Unfortunately, there’s not a quick way to migrate all of the pre-existing post images over to S3, but on the plus side, they still work fine on the local web server.  They just don’t take advantage of the Amazon S3 speed boost.  This weekend I’ll go through my high-volume posts (like the Twitter ones) and moving the images over to S3 manually, but I’ll leave the rest of the older ones on the local server for now.

Every Image Counts – and Costs

Social Homes Plugin
Social Homes Plugin

Every little image counts, though.  I recently added the WordPress plugin Social Homes, which shows little icons for all of your social networks.  Visitors can click on those links to jump to your profile on other web sites.  I loved the way it looked, but it had a horrendous impact on my page load times.  Other sites aren’t using the fastest web servers around, and they took quite a while to deliver the favicon files involved.

Here’s a screenshot of FireBug when loading my site, and notice all the favicon.ico files loaded from all over the web.

Loading Favicons From Everywhere
Loading Favicons From Everywhere

This didn’t make my web server perform poorly – after all, the images were already hosted on the other web sites – but it made my page load slowly.  Even worse, if one of the social networking sites was down (which happens more than you’d think) then the “Loading” stage would last forever on my web site.  To the visitors, it seemed like the page was loading slow, and that sucks.

The first thing I did was copy all of those favicon.ico files to Amazon S3 so I could cache them all myself.

Next, I copied the HTML produced by Social Homes, and used a text editor to replace the image names so that they pointed to my own site:

Old: <img src=”http://www.facebook.com/favicon.ico”…

New: <img src=”https://www.brentozar.com/favicon-facebook.ico” …

Then I removed the Social Homes widget and replaced it with a plain text widget with my copy/pasted HTML.  Presto, faster page load times.

There’s a cost to this: I pay for bandwidth used at S3 as well as $.01 per 10,000 “get” requests.  If you sit here hitting refresh on my web page, you can run me out of pocket change.  On the plus side, though, my web site stays fast and stays up even if Ashton Kutcher name-drops me.

I’m ready.  Coming soon: how to build your own Hackintosh Pro.

Previous Post
How to Get a Junior DBA Job – Part 3
Next Post
How to Telecommute: Getting the Job

12 Comments. Leave new

  • I’m afraid I havent used S3 myself yet. Are there no options for adjusting cache settings? If you could make the cache-control public and set an expires header, you can completely spare the client for making all those 304 IMS requests for S3. Since the favicons most likely don’t change often, there’s no reason for the client to make a request for those on each pageview. The same probably goes for your top banner, you can always change the URL if you need to force change the content after allowing clients to cache them locally.

    Reply
  • Yeah, you can set an expires header but there weren’t any settings on the SocialHomes plugin that would cache the favicons. I was pretty surprised by that.

    On the top banner, there’s a separate issue: this WordPress theme chooses a random image every time from a collection. That part really hosed up the caching. I switched to a hard-coded single-image stored on S3 so that I could avoid that random bit, even though I liked the random effect.

    Reply
  • But now that you’re storing the favicon images yourself on S3, can’t you then add an expires header yourself to S3? After all its 16 superfluous requests the client has to make – almost 30% of the total amount of requests required.

    I think the random banner added a nice touch as well – I can see that you’re also getting that from S3 now. If it’s a limitation in WP, it should be a quick fix to add a line of Javascript that inserted a random image pulled from S3.

    Reply
  • There still a problem with your Favicons. Only Intensedebate.com is showing now. All the others are disabled even thou I can access them eg. http://i.brentozar.com/favicon-brightkite.ico

    Hope it helps
    Thanks for the article, I was looking for something like this as I plan to re-start my blog site.

    Reply
  • I think a lot depends on actual webhost. I run a website with about 3500 page view per business day (sort of SQL Server related). I have Joomla + a bit of WordPress (300 pages/day) as my content management systems. I do not have any caching enabled. I am using lunarpages.com as my provider for the last 2 years. And I am on their cheapest plan – I pay about 7$ per month prepaid yearly. I have 5 about 40kb images on my website (advertising images). And so far there was no problem with performance or anybody complaining about my website using too much resources. So again, it really depends on the webhosts. Some of them oversell their servers and then cannot handle trafic…

    Reply
  • Yes, the favicons are not showing up properly. BTW Brent, love the changes on your site. It looks amazing.

    Reply
  • Innnteresting – it works on my Mac, but not on my Windows browsers. (sigh) I hate web development…

    Reply
  • Whew – fixed the favicons. Had to use gifs because Internet Explorer was barfing on the icon file formats. This stuff makes database development look easy.

    Reply
  • > Every Image Counts
    ACK; and every hit too; and the summed up size of 17 gifs, even more.
    So why dont you combine those 17(!) little icons into one and add an imagemap to it which allows the required 17 links, depending on the position?
    hth, regards georg
    PS: you will also be interested in a bandwidth and request saving technique called css-sprites.

    Reply
  • addition: Brent, you DO want to check out the Firefox Extension YSLow, and test your site withit see: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/5369

    Reply
  • Georg – that’s more work than I want to put into my website. 😀

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.

Menu