Launch week: the Season Pass & Fundamentals Week are 50% off — ends in 10d 12h 22mSee the sale

T-SQL & Development

Tell Us What You Make: The 2018 Data Professional Salary Survey

Not what you’re worth, dear reader: we know your worth cannot possibly be calculated in base-10 numbering systems because you’re just so awesome, but what you make.

How many stacks of Paul Whites are you pulling down?

A few things to know:

  • It’s totally anonymous (we’re not getting your email, IP address, or anything like that.)
  • It’s open to all database platforms.
  • As with last year’s results, we’ll publish the raw data in Excel for anyone to analyze. If you want to set up your analysis ahead of time, here’s the incoming raw results as they happen (over 3,000), and we’ll share them in that exact same format. To get them in Excel now, click File, Download.
  • One interesting note already: it looks like female DBAs make less money.

Take the 2018 Data Professional Salary Survey now (closed, over), and thanks for your help in giving everybody in the community a better chance to talk honestly with their managers about salary.

Free, 3× a week

Get my new posts by email

Three posts a week, plus a Monday roundup of the best database news from around the web.

42 comments

  1. Thanks for collecting this data again! Hopefully, this will catch on and we’ll get more and more people to get a clearer picture of our industry.

    Also, off topic, but I really appreciate your options for the gender question 🙂

  2. I’m glad to see the survey is happening again this year! I’ve noticed that despite the wealth of salary data about tech oriented professions, the info about data focused roles is often lacking. I hope the number of respondents is even better this year and will encourage everyone I know who works in the data realm to contribute. Thanks for promoting some transparency in our industry!

  3. This is interesting. I’m curious to see the results.
    I looked at the preview results in Google Sheets. Postal code isn’t being forced to a character data type, and it drops the leading zero of a zip code. This makes my 5 digit New Jersey ZIP look like an ambiguous 4 digit ZIP, maybe from San Luis Potosí, Moctezuma, Mexico.

    1. Martyn – hahaha, yeah, at the end of it, we’ll let the community decide which lines to cleanse. It’s not unusual to throw out high and low end numbers whenever free text entry comes into play.

    2. I think the US East Coast will be greatly misrepresented since leading zeros are dropped and some folks obviously just put in the first few of their zip. I just did a quick review of US only by zip and had to remove about 600 rows due to incomplete or missing zip code data, that is currently about 1/3 of the US data.

      Other than that, it is great info and I have a pretty good idea of the going rate is in my area.

      Thanks for putting this together!

  4. Hi, Thanks for doing this again Brent. I didn’t take part last year but have done this time around. On a very quick look at the data collected so far I think it’s fair to say I’m a little underpaid! (UK equivalent to $56k for a DBA / BI developer…)

    1. It’s all the Data Scientists getting paid $1,450,000 that leave little remaining budget for other members of the BI team like you. 😉

  5. is something treating the zip code as a number if it’s all digits? It looks like the leading 0 got dropped off my entry which will make it hard to differentiate between large parts of Wisconsin and Vermont.

  6. There does seem to be a high standard deviation in the salary. It may help to exclude the outliers before we start averaging. Also, the term “DBA” is loosely defined. It makes no sense to compare the yearly gross income of some guy who happens to be the CEO of a startup (managing the database server as a side hustle) or someone who own their own consultancy to a staff salaried DBA.

    1. Eric – c’mon, seriously, no startup CEO is taking this survey calling themselves a DBA. If you’re not sure about that, read the rest of the questions and the highly paid peoples’ answers to understand what they’re doing.

      1. Thanks, Brent. OK, I see it now. The guy describes his role as: “Architect, Data Scientist, Developer, App code (C#, JS, etc), Developer, and T-SQL, Manager”. That obviously explains the $1,450,000 annual salary.

        So, here is my take away from this survey:

        – Being a jack-of-all-trades really really pays off. Seriously, why are the rest of us specializing?

        – Too bad this (1) enterprising individual isn’t Female, because she alone would have flipped the gender gap for this dataset in the opposite direction… Maybe next year.

        – Interestingly enough, when asked if he’s looking for another job right now, he replied: “Yes, but only passively (just curious)”, so the plum job he’s in now might be up for grabs in the near future. Damn, wish I knew he company name he works for and I’d send them my resume.

        😉

  7. Hi Brent,
    great to see you put up that survey again, thanks for your work! Just one issue/question: I can open and download your Google sheet OK, but it seems not to be accessible via the API for me. Not sure, could be my fault, or your intention, or maybe it’s something you can change, any idea?

    1. Thomas – I’m not a Sheets API pro, but I did some quick Googling and it looks like that’s for editing the sheet. It’s not set up for folks to be able to edit it for obvious reasons. 😀

      1. Ha ha, I beg you, I am a SheetsAPI noob myself. Auntie Google just led me to the hint that “Published to the web” and “Public on the web” are different things, which might be worth a thought (I thought). I was not actually thinking about editing the survey, it was just a quick jump at importing the as-current-as-possible data directly into R, without downloading the xls first.
        I was, however, able to add it to my GoogleSheet repository (or whatever it’s called), and can grab it from there using the API. But then, that’s probably also a copy, not a linked object. Have to elaborate on that…

          1. Update: it’s some link alright – it has grown by twentysomething entries since I last tried it this afternoon, cool! Brent, would it be OK for you to see your survey as a data source in one of my presentations, the one at SQLBits for instance? ?

  8. Of course my takeaway above was intended to be satire. Any serious conclusions would need to filter out the standard deviations, like the “Male” DBA with the “$1,450,000 annual salary”.

  9. This is really nice! One detail that might also be useful is age of the professional. Salary for a 35 year old with 10 years DB experience might look a lot different than for someone who’s 45. Might help explain some of those wider pay ranges where all other details look similar.

      1. Yeah I narrowed down to zips in my state. But this might also be helpful if one was curious what others in their age group are making around the country. Could make a nice heat map with that detail.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email me about new comments: