<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to REALLY Compress Your SQL Server Backups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/02/how-to-really-compress-your-sql-server-backups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/02/how-to-really-compress-your-sql-server-backups/</link>
	<description>Your technology pain-relief experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ozar</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/02/how-to-really-compress-your-sql-server-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-31366</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=6843#comment-31366</guid>
		<description>Justin - keep in mind that indexes aren&#039;t duplicate data.  If I have one index by first name and one by last name, those indexes are duplicate in the sense that the original row of data has both the first and last name, but the backup compression won&#039;t give me 3x compression on that data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin &#8211; keep in mind that indexes aren&#8217;t duplicate data.  If I have one index by first name and one by last name, those indexes are duplicate in the sense that the original row of data has both the first and last name, but the backup compression won&#8217;t give me 3x compression on that data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Dearing</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/02/how-to-really-compress-your-sql-server-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-31359</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dearing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=6843#comment-31359</guid>
		<description>Brent,

Your claim of 50-55% smaller backups is on the resulting compressed backup? What about a regular uncompressed full backup of the real DB versus the trimmed one?

Compression is really good at shrinking away duplicate data (which is why IIS and apache logs compress so well) so I&#039;m a bit skeptical how removing padding, which removes empty rows, would help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brent,</p>
<p>Your claim of 50-55% smaller backups is on the resulting compressed backup? What about a regular uncompressed full backup of the real DB versus the trimmed one?</p>
<p>Compression is really good at shrinking away duplicate data (which is why IIS and apache logs compress so well) so I&#8217;m a bit skeptical how removing padding, which removes empty rows, would help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar Zamora</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/02/how-to-really-compress-your-sql-server-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-23341</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar Zamora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=6843#comment-23341</guid>
		<description>I think you just gave me a great workaround. Moving the partition to a new filegroup. Will try that out. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you just gave me a great workaround. Moving the partition to a new filegroup. Will try that out. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ozar</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2010/02/how-to-really-compress-your-sql-server-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-23340</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=6843#comment-23340</guid>
		<description>No, you can&#039;t, unfortunately.  By creating a new filegroup, and moving that partition to the new filegroup, you can get that filegroup right-sized to begin with, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, you can&#8217;t, unfortunately.  By creating a new filegroup, and moving that partition to the new filegroup, you can get that filegroup right-sized to begin with, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 534/548 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.brentozar.com @ 2012-02-09 06:58:00 -->
