<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SQL Server 2008 R2: The DAC Pack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/08/sql-server-2008-r2-the-dac-pack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/08/sql-server-2008-r2-the-dac-pack/</link>
	<description>Your technology pain-relief experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bertrand : The curious case(s) of the Microsoft product naming department</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/08/sql-server-2008-r2-the-dac-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-26681</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bertrand : The curious case(s) of the Microsoft product naming department</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=4616#comment-26681</guid>
		<description>[...] during the R2 beta, but it fell on deaf ears.&#160; Even Brent Ozar makes fun of the fact that DTA was already taken - not that that would have been a better acronym, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] during the R2 beta, but it fell on deaf ears.&nbsp; Even Brent Ozar makes fun of the fact that DTA was already taken &#8211; not that that would have been a better acronym, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plagiarism Week: Finding the Slimy Slimeballs &#124; Brent Ozar - Too Much Information</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/08/sql-server-2008-r2-the-dac-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-24521</link>
		<dc:creator>Plagiarism Week: Finding the Slimy Slimeballs &#124; Brent Ozar - Too Much Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=4616#comment-24521</guid>
		<description>[...] particularly proud of, I even set up Google Alerts for key phrases in the post.  For example, in my SQL Server 2008 DAC Pack blog post, I used the phrase &#8220;Bringing Sexy DAC.&#8221;  I can be fairly certain that phrase will not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] particularly proud of, I even set up Google Alerts for key phrases in the post.  For example, in my SQL Server 2008 DAC Pack blog post, I used the phrase &#8220;Bringing Sexy DAC.&#8221;  I can be fairly certain that phrase will not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ozar</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/08/sql-server-2008-r2-the-dac-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-22675</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=4616#comment-22675</guid>
		<description>JAC - good question.  The DAC makes changing the host SQL Server easier because all of the objects required for the database live inside the DAC.  With traditional SQL Server databases, we had objects outside the database - things like logins, linked servers, DTS packages, Agent jobs, and so forth.  The DAC is a self-contained unit so it&#039;s much easier to move them around from server to server.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JAC &#8211; good question.  The DAC makes changing the host SQL Server easier because all of the objects required for the database live inside the DAC.  With traditional SQL Server databases, we had objects outside the database &#8211; things like logins, linked servers, DTS packages, Agent jobs, and so forth.  The DAC is a self-contained unit so it&#8217;s much easier to move them around from server to server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAC</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2009/08/sql-server-2008-r2-the-dac-pack/comment-page-1/#comment-22673</link>
		<dc:creator>JAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=4616#comment-22673</guid>
		<description>This appears to help with multiple instances of a database but i dont understand why it gets compared to Virtual Server management.  For a while I have used DNS aliases for High profile databases so i can move them relatively quickly and without updating every application in the firm.  How does the DAC make changing the host SQL server easier ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to help with multiple instances of a database but i dont understand why it gets compared to Virtual Server management.  For a while I have used DNS aliases for High profile databases so i can move them relatively quickly and without updating every application in the firm.  How does the DAC make changing the host SQL server easier ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 530/536 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.brentozar.com @ 2012-02-08 22:32:51 -->
