<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long live the DBA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/08/long-live-the-dba/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/08/long-live-the-dba/</link>
	<description>SQL Server database administration, performance tuning, consulting, training, and community building.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/08/long-live-the-dba/comment-page-1/#comment-15666</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/?p=1125#comment-15666</guid>
		<description>*great* article. I&#039;m a SQL Developer (TSQL, SSRS, SSAS etc) more than a DBA and am watching the cloud thing with interest. I suspect it&#039;s going to end up like outsourcing - one manager thinks it&#039;s great and can save costs by outsourcing, a few years later new manager thinks he can make cost reductions by bringing it al back in-house, a year or two later ... (repeat ad nasueam). So it&#039;ll be cloud, in-house, cloud etc etc

Also it&#039;ll end up similar to preferred supplier agreements, where after a year or two you notice your preferred supplier is charging you $200 for a DVD drive that costs $30 at your local PC store. Eventually they end up being way more expensive. Once your datacentre started billing you $150/hour for &#039;DBA work&#039; while employing graduates on about $25k/year to be the DBAs, the hunt is on for a new datacentre or... back in-house.

I&#039;ve been doing I.T. now for 20 years and I&#039;ve seen so many &#039;technologies&#039; come along that are going to make us all redundant. Never happens. I.T. is one big gravy train that goes on and on and on costing zillions every year, a decent chunk of which goes to us. It never gets more efficient, easier, or cheaper. 

Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*great* article. I&#8217;m a SQL Developer (TSQL, SSRS, SSAS etc) more than a DBA and am watching the cloud thing with interest. I suspect it&#8217;s going to end up like outsourcing &#8211; one manager thinks it&#8217;s great and can save costs by outsourcing, a few years later new manager thinks he can make cost reductions by bringing it al back in-house, a year or two later &#8230; (repeat ad nasueam). So it&#8217;ll be cloud, in-house, cloud etc etc</p>
<p>Also it&#8217;ll end up similar to preferred supplier agreements, where after a year or two you notice your preferred supplier is charging you $200 for a DVD drive that costs $30 at your local PC store. Eventually they end up being way more expensive. Once your datacentre started billing you $150/hour for &#8216;DBA work&#8217; while employing graduates on about $25k/year to be the DBAs, the hunt is on for a new datacentre or&#8230; back in-house.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been doing I.T. now for 20 years and I&#8217;ve seen so many &#8216;technologies&#8217; come along that are going to make us all redundant. Never happens. I.T. is one big gravy train that goes on and on and on costing zillions every year, a decent chunk of which goes to us. It never gets more efficient, easier, or cheaper. </p>
<p>Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
