<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HP C-Class Blade Chassis Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/</link>
	<description>Your technology pain-relief experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ozar</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/comment-page-1/#comment-32621</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/#comment-32621</guid>
		<description>Brahim - could you be more specific?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brahim &#8211; could you be more specific?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brahim</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/comment-page-1/#comment-32620</link>
		<dc:creator>Brahim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 12:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/#comment-32620</guid>
		<description>Have problem between enclosure HP c3000 and server HP Blade system BL480c-G1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have problem between enclosure HP c3000 and server HP Blade system BL480c-G1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Ozar</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/comment-page-1/#comment-11333</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Ozar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/#comment-11333</guid>
		<description>Jose - have you called HP for support?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jose &#8211; have you called HP for support?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Luis Resendiz</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/comment-page-1/#comment-11332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Luis Resendiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2008/01/hp-c-class-blade-chassis-review/#comment-11332</guid>
		<description>Hi, we have a new C7000, and looks great, but I have 4 net segments in my LAN, and I setup a pair Linux Suse on the enclosure, one is fine with the address 192.168.11.65, but the other with address 192.168.17.243 runs well only for 10 or 12 hours and then the connection to that server is not working...this is strange...and I see the alarm system degraded...I apply the new firmware to 2.60 but that not fix the problem.
Can you help please?
Regards!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, we have a new C7000, and looks great, but I have 4 net segments in my LAN, and I setup a pair Linux Suse on the enclosure, one is fine with the address 192.168.11.65, but the other with address 192.168.17.243 runs well only for 10 or 12 hours and then the connection to that server is not working&#8230;this is strange&#8230;and I see the alarm system degraded&#8230;I apply the new firmware to 2.60 but that not fix the problem.<br />
Can you help please?<br />
Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 529/537 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.brentozar.com @ 2012-02-08 22:37:21 -->
