<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PASS Summit 2007: Day One Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2007/09/pass-summit-2007-day-one-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2007/09/pass-summit-2007-day-one-notes/</link>
	<description>Your technology pain-relief experts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:37:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Snyder</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2007/09/pass-summit-2007-day-one-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Snyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 20:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2007/09/pass-summit-2007-day-one-notes/#comment-4798</guid>
		<description>Regarding the upgrade to SQL 2008 from SQL 2000, Microsoft will (and recently has) always supported easy upgrade from the prior two releases. That will be the case with SQL 2008 as well.  I believe that the best testing of the most cases for upgrade will almost always be the direct upgrade from the prior release.  Even though MS will work hard to test from 2 releases back, I suspect that if they must focus more resources on one, it would be the most recent upgrade.  We should always test upgrades very well, but if I were upgrading from two releases back, I would expect more issues, and manual stuff, that I would generally expect from the most recent release.

As a reminder, this is my opinion only.

Thanks for attending PASS this year - it was a great week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the upgrade to SQL 2008 from SQL 2000, Microsoft will (and recently has) always supported easy upgrade from the prior two releases. That will be the case with SQL 2008 as well.  I believe that the best testing of the most cases for upgrade will almost always be the direct upgrade from the prior release.  Even though MS will work hard to test from 2 releases back, I suspect that if they must focus more resources on one, it would be the most recent upgrade.  We should always test upgrades very well, but if I were upgrading from two releases back, I would expect more issues, and manual stuff, that I would generally expect from the most recent release.</p>
<p>As a reminder, this is my opinion only.</p>
<p>Thanks for attending PASS this year &#8211; it was a great week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2007/09/pass-summit-2007-day-one-notes/comment-page-1/#comment-4787</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 04:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brentozar.com/archive/2007/09/pass-summit-2007-day-one-notes/#comment-4787</guid>
		<description>You took some pretty good notes today. I agree that Kalen Delany is a great speaker. Glad you are enjoying the conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You took some pretty good notes today. I agree that Kalen Delany is a great speaker. Glad you are enjoying the conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 495/499 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.brentozar.com @ 2012-02-08 22:27:08 -->
